Amy and Deia are Facing Prison for Reporting! That Should Scare Us All.

First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

A clear attack on journalism and freedom of the press.


This Monday afternoon, as the sun hits its peak over Mandan, North Dakota, the award-winning journalist, and host of Democracy Now!, Amy Goodman will walk into the Morton County–Mandan Combined Law Enforcement and Corrections Center and turn herself in to the local authorities. Her crime: good, unflinching journalism. Goodman had the audacity to commit this journalism on September 3, when she was in North Dakota covering what she calls “the standoff at Standing Rock”: the months-long protests by thousands of Native Americans against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The $3.8 billion oil pipeline is slated to carry barrel after barrel of Bakken crude through sacred sites and burial grounds of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, and tribe members fear it could pollute the Missouri River, the source not only of their water but of millions of others’, should the pipe ever rupture. Their protests, which began in April and ballooned through the summer months, represent the largest mobilization of Native American activists in more than 40 years—and one of the most vital campaigns for environmental justice in perhaps as long.

Goodman’s arrival at the main protest site, the Sacred Stone Spirit Camp, was significant. At the time, not a single one of the major broadcast networks had sent a reporter to cover the Standing Rock mobilization; none had even bothered to mention it on the air. But there was Goodman, standing at the edge of a grassy plain that was in the process of being churned into gullies of dirt, reporting on one of the most significant stories of the day. Clutching a large microphone, she captured the scene as hundreds of protesters tried desperately to stop a crew of bulldozers from tearing up the earth—the earth, they said, that belongs to nobody—only to be confronted by a force of private security contractors wielding attack dogs and pepper spray. “People have gone through the fence, men, women, and children,” Goodman reported, her voice taut, then rising, louder and more intense. “The bulldozers are still going, and they’re yelling at the men in hard hats. One man in a hard hat threw one of the protesters down…!”

As Goodman narrated, a security contractor, burly in a deep blue shirt, could be seen belly-flopping a man onto the ground. Protesters streamed in to help him, stumbled over mounds of newly churned dirt, faced off with contractors whose faces were hidden behind oversized sunglasses. The scene was full of movement. Overhead, a helicopter hovered, circled, while back on the ground, protesters began to report burning eyes, and dogs—dogs lurching at protesters, dogs straining against their leashes, dogs with mouths open, mouths biting. “Why are you letting the dog go after the protesters?” Goodman could be heard shouting at a security contractor as a woman screamed in the background. “It’s covered in blood!”

Within hours of the attack, Democracy Now! had turned its footage into a seven-minute video that it released as a web exclusive. Three days later, Goodman followed up with an extensive report—“Dakota Access Pipeline Co. Attacks Native Americans with Dogs and Pepper Spray”—that she broadcast live on her show. The video quickly went viral, pinging across Twitter and Facebook (where it was viewed more than 14 million times) and landing, ultimately, on the same big news stations that, until that moment, hadn’t bothered to cover the protests: CNN, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NPR.

Goodman’s report created a rare crack in the consensus of silence. And, as Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi writes, the outrage it generated may well have influenced the Obama administration’s decision to halt work on the pipeline several days later. This was journalism that mattered.

Yet, on September 8, Goodman received the news that Morton County, North Dakota, had issued a warrant for her arrest. The charge: riot, a misdemeanor punishable by jail time and a fine. (It should be noted that the original charge leveled against Goodman was not riot but criminal trespass, also a misdemeanor. However, just days days before Goodman was set to appear in court, the prosecutor, Ladd Erickson, switched up the charges because, he admitted in an email to Goodman’s lawyer, Tom Dickson, there were “legal issues with proving the notice of trespassing requirements in the statute.”)

When asked to explain the grounds for arresting a working journalist, Erickson told the Grand Forks Herald that he did not, in fact, consider Goodman a journalist. “She’s a protester, basically,” Erickson told the newspaper. “Everything she reported on was from the position of justifying the protest actions.” And in The Bismarck Tribune he later added, “I think she put together a piece to influence the world on her agenda, basically. That’s fine, but it doesn’t immunize her from the laws of her state.” It’s worth pausing here for a moment to contemplate the full and chilling absurdity of this statement: According to Erickson, a woman who appeared at a protest carrying a microphone emblazoned with the name Democracy Now! and trailing a video crew; who can be heard in the resulting video report identifying herself to a security guard as a reporter; and who then broadcast the video on the daily news program she has hosted for 20 years is not actually a journalist. She is not a journalist, because she harbors a strong perspective, and that perspective clashes with his own. By the same distorted logic, every muckraking news gatherer from Ida Tarbell and Upton Sinclair on through I.F. Stone, and, yes, today’s Matt Taibbi (whose work Erickson apparently admires) was not a journalist but an activist flirting with arrest.

This notion should disturb anyone who labors in the journalism trenches, particularly those who dedicate their days, and often nights, to covering stories that challenge the mighty and prick at the powerful. Engaging in serious journalism—journalism that captures a society’s forbidden, or simply hidden, stories—is hard and scary, and it requires bravery, conviction, and determination, along with an abiding faith in the protective power of the First Amendment. When that faith is compromised, the possibility of serious journalism collapses—a reason, no doubt, the Committee to Protect Journalists came out forcefully on Goodman’s behalf.

“This arrest warrant is a transparent attempt to intimidate reporters from covering protests of significant public interest,” Carlos Lauría, senior program coordinator for the Americas at CPJ, said in a statement. “Authorities in North Dakota should stop embarrassing themselves, drop the charges against Amy Goodman, and ensure that all reporters are free to do their jobs.” Thus far, the North Dakota authorities remain committed to their own embarrassment; the charges have not been dropped, which is why Goodman is going back to North Dakota to turn herself in—and then fight the charges.

A few weeks back, as I drove with Goodman to and from a memorial service (full disclosure: Goodman is a family friend whom I have known for a long time and once worked for), I overheard an admirer of hers ask what the public could do to support her as she faced arrest. Goodman was quick to respond: keep paying attention to the protesters in North Dakota, keep caring about their fight. She, in other words, was not the story.

Goodman was right, of course. The long struggle of the Standing Rock Sioux, which is a struggle against broken treaties, environmental injustice, and government-sanctioned kleptomania, is older than this country and as essential to its future as it is to its past. Yet, without someone to hold a microphone to the activists’ lips or train a camera on their protests, the story often gets lost. We risk missing the message, uttered by a man with a raw voice and pained face, toward the end of Democracy Now!’s viral video: “No one owns this land. This land belongs to the earth. We are only caretakers. We’re caretakers of the earth.”

Note: This article has been updated to reflect the news that the charges against Goodman were switched from criminal trespassing to riot.


Filmmaker Arrested At Pipeline Protest Facing 45 Years In Felony Charges


A documentarian arrested while filming an oil pipeline protest on Tuesday has been charged with three felony conspiracy charges ― and could face decades in prison if convicted.

Deia Schlosberg, the producer of the upcoming documentary “How to Let Go of the World and Love All Things Climate Can’t Change,” was detained while filming a protest against TransCanada’s Keystone Pipeline in Walhalla, North Dakota. Activists at the event, associated with the group Climate Direct Action, shut down the pipeline, which carries oil from Canadian tar sands to the U.S, for about seven hours.

Two of the protestors, Michael Foster and Samuel Jessup, were also charged and Schlosberg’s equipment and footage from the event was confiscated. Schlosberg said shortly after being released on bond that she couldn’t comment on her arrest until she spoke to a lawyer.

She has been charged with three felonies: conspiracy to theft of property, conspiracy to theft of services and conspiracy to tampering with or damaging a public service. Together, the charges carry 45 years in maximum prison sentences.

Josh Fox, the director of the film and two others related to fossil fuels, including the Academy Award-nominated “Gasland,” said Schlosberg wasn’t participating in the protest herself but acting as filmmaker to document the event. Her arrest appears to reflect a “deliberate” targeting of reporters, he said.

“They have in my view violated the First Amendment,” Fox said, referring to the state’s Pembina County Sheriff’s Department. “It’s fucking scary, it knocks the wind of your sails, it throws you for a loop. They threw the book at Deia for being a journalist.”

Ryan Bialas, state’s attorney for Pembina County, told The Huffington Post there was no such targeting and said the event at the pipeline was “not a protest” but “a criminal action.”

“People are free to come and protest as much as they want in my county, I just ask they don’t damage any property in doing so,” Bialas said in an email. He also noted his office has offered to return Schlosberg’s equipment and footage and he has “no interest” in keeping it. The arrest is the latest in a series of high-profile criminal charges filed in North Dakota. Police arrested actress Shailene Woodley and 27 others this week for trespassing while protesting the proposed Dakota Access Pipeline.

And authorities issued an arrest warrant for criminal trespassing for Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! last month, who filmed a thousands-strong Native American-led protest in September, which was met with guards wielding pepper spray and attack dogs.

Goodman announced this week she will surrender to authorities on Monday “to fight this charge … a clear violation of the First Amendment.”

Fox said the actions in North Dakota were “mind boggling” and he hasn’t seen “any other state behave this way.”

“Normally you get a warning,” he said, referencing other direct-action protests. “In North Dakota, you don’t. If you were trespassing, you leave and they arrest you anyway.”

He has been circulating a letter calling for the charges against Schlosberg to be dropped. Signatories include actress Daryl Hannah, musician Neil Young, activist Bill McKibben and actor Mark Ruffalo.

Bialas said he was unaware of the criminal action against both Woodley and Goodman and that his office does “not “target activists, journalists or media.



14 thoughts on “Amy and Deia are Facing Prison for Reporting! That Should Scare Us All.

  1. I can’t believe this will go far. Obama has stopped the pipeline so there is no there there. It still is a sad commentary on how big business tries to control and run everything. Where is Bernie?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. NOW you cry foul? LOL.
    What about the other journalists who’ve been imprisoned, or awaiting trial. Oh, yeh, I forgot. Those were not progressives like the establishment is,, so they don’t matter.


  3. shak, what a short sighted view you have. Progressives believe in a free and unencumbered press, no matter what their political leanings. People are hopefully able to separate the wheat from the chaff.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Not all of the 200 political prisoners in the u.s. did what the trumped up charges said they did.
      Schaefer Cox, Pete Santilli, Jeff
      The fact that names did not spring forth from the lips here doesn’t surprise me.
      The choir will sing “Oh, but, that was different..”.
      To which I bid g’day.


  4. Good for you Mola. I guess I will google the two names. The Jeff guy has no last name.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Cox is not a journalist. He supports 2nd amend, Palin. Member of Alaska militia called Gideons army. Santilli was arrested at the take over of Federal office in eastern Oregon. Was arrested at a roadblock. Says he is a journalist but unaffiliated with any news organization.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Cox ran for office, promoted the constitution. He encouraged people to unite and vote the bums/tyrants out. He said the tyrants are taking themselves out by self imploding, which will leave a void that is ripe for filling. But people, voters, have to be braver than beyond brave, due to the arrests of constitutionists. Here is one of his speeches before arrest.

      Pete Santilli has a blogger radio show. He heard about the unrest in Nevada and rallied the peaceful listeners to show support. He himself live streamed the event, interviewed both sides, encouraged peaceful solution. He also livestreamed the riots in Ferguson and other places. He, of course, livestreamed the commotion in Oregon. He is a journalist.

      Irwin Schiff, father of the Zerohedge, died in prison.
      Breitbart mysteriously died on the street.
      Jeff was accused of harming or killing two cops, even though he proved he was 300 miles away.


  6. Interesting my post ate the dirt.


  7. Peter Schiff’s daddy, Irwin, died in prison for speaking out.. ((zerohedge).
    Brietbart’s daddy mysteriously died after speaking out..

    Shaeffer Cox ran for office. He promoted the constitution. He encouraged voters to unite & vote our liberty back. Youtube offers one of his speeches, The Solution to Reclaiming Liberty. He pointed out that the tyrants were taking their own selves down, the collapse is eminent. The only solution to avoid anarchy is to unite with constitutional knowledge and the ballot. He was arrested.

    Pete Santilli is a radio blogger who livestreamed important events. Nevada, Ferguson, Oregon are just a few.

    The first amendment assures freedom of speach.

    Jeff is easy to find. He was a journalist who was accused of killing two cops, despite being 350 miles away.

    Credentials don’t make the profession. Speaking, reporting, investigating, does.


  8. The problem here is the definition of the word “Journalist.” Some people have been known to call themselves journalists to shield their activities. There have been others who have spent their lives working alone and doing great service in the field (I.F. Stone comes to mind).

    The essential issue is if they were arrested for performing their journalistic tasks. In the case of the subjects of the article this is obviously the case.

    Running a blog does not make one automatically a Journalist. It all boils down to what the charges are against the folks Shaq mentions. Were they recording events on the part of others or being actively involved in crimes?

    Doing what amounts to PR for a cause does not make a person a Journalist, nor does that make it a shield from prosecution for crimes committed.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Mola, no offense, but if the term journalist is replaced with mechanic or stockboy, the entire conspiracy falls apart. Every person is supposed to be held accountable for any crime they commit. Inserting the word possibly before the word commit is tinfoil hat & unconstitutional. Innocent until proven guilty is what made our country great. Possibly guilty, therefore we will demean & dismiss is what has made america suck.
      Your thoughts are pretty in verse, just not in practicality. True, this is an impractical orwellian time we’re living in, but that doesn’t make it right.
      This is what’s right: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
      Credentials aren’t needed for freelancers, unless they plan on attending city councils or tunneling through classified documents. Dismissing non credentialed alternative freelancers is pc in some circles, but that’s all it is, is political nonsense.
      Whether a freelancer has been blogging for a month or for 20 years is not evidence of genineness. Only the person themself knows his own heart.

      Just as I pointed out previously, too many sheep believe it’s okay to look the other way when it’s not an issue that profits them in some way. That’s the real issue.
      First they came for the non credentialed, but I did not speak up, because I am credentialed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s