The Owl Massacre of 2016

Proposed Timber Sale to Take Over 100 Northern Spotted Owls

Westside Project—a massive logging project on the Klamath National Forest. The Klamath National Forest has proposed logging approximately 6,800 acres of clearcuts near the Klamath River. The majority of these clearcuts—upwards of 70%—are scheduled for northern spotted owl critical habitat and/or “Late Successional Reserves,” lands set aside for northern spotted owls.

NSO Juvenile Oregon Fish and Wildlife Service

On Friday, February 19, 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued its Biological Opinion on the Westside Project which detailed the amount of carnage this logging project would cause to northern spotted owls. The numbers are grim. All told, the Westside Project would “take” up to 103 owls; 74 adults and between 12–24 juveniles.

To put this number in perspective, this represents 1–2% of all northern spotted owls left. While this might not seem like a lot, rangewide populations of northern spotted owl are in increasingly steep decline. A recent demographic study estimates that northern spotted owl populations have declined by 3.8% per year from 1985 to 2013 and suggests the rate of decline appears to be increasing.

The Westside Project has drawn widespread condemnation. Over 13,000 people have written to the Forest Service asking for the project to be pulled. The Karuk Tribe, which has lived in the project area for time immemorial, has expressed deep concerns over the project and submitted their own proposal to the Forest Service for consideration, which was rejected by the Service.

The Klamath National Forest justifies such horrific impacts on the premise of improved future conditions for the owl. In their logic, by logging, the Forest Service will be able to start a new forest faster, one that has a lessened risk of reburning in the future because fuel (i.e., owl habitat) is removed. Even if you buy the Forest Service’s speculative argument—that guaranteed short-term harm is outweighed by possible long-term benefit–there is still a catch: the Forest Service does not have the money to do the forest restoration work they promise. Receipts from timber sales will not cover the myriad of promises the Forest Service has made to get this project through and the Service admits that future funding is “uncertain” and likely “insufficient to accomplished all needed restoration work.”

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has expressed skepticism of the Forest Service’s propose. Last fall, the top official charged with spotted owl recovery wrote to the Forest Service stating that the Westside Project should be “minimized” where owls remain after fire because large, dead trees will “greatly improve” the quality of forest habitat as it naturally recovers over time.

The Service continued, “In general, most scientists agree that salvage logging does not contribute positively to the ecological recovery of naturally disturbed forests,” Henson wrote. “It is important for (land managers) to seek ways to implement important fuel reduction work without over-utilizing salvage logging that can adversely affect the restoration of natural conditions.”

It’s not too late to stop the Westside Project. Encourage the Klamath National Forest to withdraw its proposal.

Taken from a news release by EPIC and Tom Wheeler     http://www.wildcalifornia.org/NSO
Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The Owl Massacre of 2016

  1. Darn you enviro’s, always coming up with a stupid reason to stop progress! The spotted owl excuse has been overused. It’s time to cut, drill and extract…..that’s called moving forward. Go Trump!!!!

    *sarcasm

    Liked by 2 people

  2. “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has expressed skepticism of the Forest Service’s propose.” Yet they signed off on this, WTF! Sounds like this agency is responding to politics not biology.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Where is your outrage at the slaughter of the Barred owl (genetically identical to the Spotted owl) by the fish and wildlife biologists.
    Oh yea, this doesn’t fit your political agenda.

    Like

    • The populations of Barred Owls are not threatened, their populations is expanding since the ice age.
      You must know they are moving into Spotted Owl territory and displacing them, the Barred Owls are more adaptable.
      You are not this dumb I hope.

      Like

    • They’re genetically close (not identical). Yes we condemn the USFW program of assassinating Barred owls. It’s just a ploy to cover up bad forestry practices by the Forest Service and BLM. It’s also a complete admission of failure by US fish and wildlife to protect their survival.

      Like

  4. As if evolution and mother nature and keeping overpopulating human activity from getting outta control is not the best option. Sounds like government needs taxes, so it is going to harvest timber instead because the American ponsai scheme economy aint working out so well now that more people are getting a clue.

    Processes are all rigged, all processes, all the time!

    Like

  5. JP’s comments can’t be for real, or maybe JP is blind in one eye and can’t see out the other. I am afraid that a seeing eye dog is not going to be much help. Must have had a brain freeze.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s