The States two major print media outlets have outed “today’s” Jerry Brown for who he really is, and how he wants to grab the power and take revenge.
Picture California’s 1,000-mile coastline dotted with gated housing, walled-off beach access and a hodgepodge of local building rules. It’s an impossible vision and why voters approved state oversight more than 40 years ago.
That mandate created the Coastal Commission, an agency that’s a national model in reining in development and preserving public uses along the state’s defining edge. But the pressures have never relented as political appointees to the commission’s board battle with staff and public groups in repeated run-ins over building and access.
There’s a need for balance and fairness in weighing the future of a state resource that’s also in private hands. Degree, precision and thought are needed in measuring impacts and future uses. Hotels, rock-star mansions, oil pipelines and fishing spots are all on the Coastal Commission’s checklist, making its work complicated and often controversial.
But these calculations must be done in the open and for good reasons. Instead, the commission members, all appointed by Sacramento lawmakers, including Gov. Jerry Brown, are quietly trying to push out the commission’s executive director, Charles Lester, long identified with the agency’s emphasis on preservation and open access. He succeeded Peter Douglas, who directed the commission for several decades in a hard-charging style that hewed closely to the commission’s conservationist credo.
Commission members aren’t talking, but in news reports and anonymous asides, they’re described as unhappy with Lester’s management and slow-moving style. It’s a complaint that needs to be fleshed out and made clear before any thought of his removal. A more pliable replacement who will follow handed-down messages from Sacramento politicians is a chilling prospect, one that undercuts the purpose of the commission to act directly on the public’s behalf.
Lester has asked for a hearing at a Feb. 10 meeting, an indication he doesn’t intend to go quietly. Dozens of groups spanning the state’s environmental world, including the Sierra Club, Surfrider Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and California Coastal Protection Network, are opposing his removal as “unjustified and misguided.”
The possible dismissal comes at a heated moment. Before the commission is a plan for a 1,400-home development known as Banning Ranch. The acreage is considered one of largest remaining unbuilt spots along the Orange County coast.
Along with high-profile and well-financed projects, there’s a dose of history. In his first term, Brown signed regulations that put the public vote into practice. He was an active supporter in tune with the message of controlled development.
Now the times may have changed. He has direct control over four of the 12 voting commissioners and has ducked public comment on the agency’s future. He should stand up now and safeguard an institution he helped bring to life. Firing a director in the name of easing development shouldn’t be in California’s future.
About the Coastal Commission
Approved by voters in 1972, the commission holds broad power over development and access along the coastline, ranging from a few hundred yards inland in urban areas to several miles in rural spots.
The commission emphasizes public access, a directive that has opened up Malibu beaches and the exclusive Sea Ranch area in Mendocino and is now being contested at Martins Beach in San Mateo County. Development impacts are just as important, ranging from the odd to the enormous, such as Facebook co-founder Sean Parker’s unauthorized wedding in Big Sur and a pending 1,400-home subdivision in Orange County.
The 12 commission members include private citizens and local politicians. They are named by state lawmakers with Gov. Jerry Brown controlling four seats, putting him squarely in charge of the commission’s direction.
In 1976, a year into his first term as governor, Jerry Brown signed a bill that came to be seen as one of the strongest environmental protection laws in the country. The California Coastal Act limited development along the 1,100-mile shoreline and guaranteed public access to the beach.
Yet just two years later, Brown had become frustrated with the commission tasked with upholding the Coastal Act. He made headlines in 1978 for calling commissioners “bureaucratic thugs.”
It was an early indication of Brown’s complicated relationship with the environmental movement, a dynamic that still shapes his governorship today. Weeks after returning from global climate-change talks in Paris that positioned Brown as an environmental leader, the fourth-term Democrat is now facing the wrath of environmentalists at home. It’s the result of a new drama unfolding on the Coastal Commission.
Conservation advocates have been critical of the decisions made by Brown’s appointees to the commission, who have voted in favor of projects environmentalists opposed. Now they are furious that the commission is holding a vote next month to dismiss Executive Director Charles Lester. They view him as an environmental guardian and say commissioners appointed by Brown are trying to oust Lester to make the coastal agency more amenable to development.
“It is kind of alarming that his appointees are trying to do this because it flies in the face of the environmental legacy that he wants to leave,” said Stefanie Sekich-Quinn, coastal preservation manager for the Surfrider Foundation.
“It’s very problematic that it’s (Brown’s) appointees.”
She and other environmentalists are pressuring Brown to intervene. So far Brown has declined to comment on the situation; his spokesman Evan Westrup wrote an email saying, “This is a matter the Coastal Commission initiated without any involvement from our office.”
The criticism from environmentalists is reminiscent of the pressure Brown faced a few years ago from activists opposed to the oil-extraction method known as fracking. They demonstrated in front of the Capitol, followed Brown to speaking appearances and raised the question of his environmental legacy after the governor signed a 2013 bill that fell short of activists’ desire to ban fracking in California.
On the other hand, environmentalists have hailed Brown’s efforts to combat climate change. He signed an executive order last year to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. He won legislative approval to increase the amount of renewable energy that flows to California’s electricity grid. He has made the battle against global warming his cause celebre, traveling to Italy for talks with Pope Francis and Paris for the conference last month that resulted in an international deal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Those who know Brown well are not surprised that he is at odds with environmentalists on the latest Coastal Commission controversy.
“He is not a 100-percent-er on any of these things and that’s what’s made him a pretty interesting and effective governor,” said journalist Orville Schell, who wrote a biography of Brown in 1978 and remains friendly with him.
“He isn’t a carbon cutout of one left or right view.”
Lester, who assumed leadership of the commission in 2011, has been through lengthy performance evaluations behind closed doors in the last three years. Publicly, commissioners have pressed him for not providing enough information about projects that have applied for permits, and a lack of ethnic diversity among commission staff.
Meanwhile, Brown has demonstrated support for the Coastal Commission. His budget proposal this month gave the commission 25 permanent positions that had been temporary. The budget Brown approved two years ago gave the commission new authority to levy fines on property owners who block public access to the beach.
Environmentalists applaud those moves, even as they criticize Brown’s appointments for steering the commission in a pro-development direction.
In August, Brown’s appointees voted to take away public use of a portion of a Malibu bluff overlooking the ocean to make way for eight new mansions. In October, on a different project in Malibu, three of the governor’s appointees voted to approve a beach restoration project that excludes a public path advocates sought.
“They are voting poorly to protect the coast,” Sekich-Quinn said.
Steve Blank, a former coastal commissioner who was appointed by Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, said Brown may assume he has the support of environmentalists because he is a Democrat.
“Under Schwarzenegger, there was an extended effort to reach out to a constituency he didn’t own. And now, with Brown, there is benign neglect of the constituency he’ll own forever,” Blank said.
Brown’s evolution from an environmental visionary 40 years ago to a fiscal watchdog today has put his legacy at risk, Blank said.
“No one is going to remember his skills as an accountant. It’s sad but true. But people will remember driving the California coast (as the result of) Jerry Brown’s signature in 1976,” Blank said. “I hope they don’t remember it as Jerry Brown’s destruction in 2016.”