On the fence on Proposition One? Let us push you off!

CALIFORNIA’S WATER BOND (PROP 1) TAXPAYERS BEING FORCED TO FEED WESTLANDS AND KERN WATER AGENCIES

CALIFORNIA’S WATER BOND (PROP 1)
TAXPAYERS BEING FORCED TO FEED WESTLANDS AND KERN WATER AGENCIES

Here are arguments from three different sources:

NO on Proposition 1—The Water Bond

Proposition 1 will not give us the water we need. It will put us, our children, and our grandchildren deeper into debt. With interest (tax-free to the wealthy bond investors), the $7.5 billion bond will cost us $360 million each year for 40 years. 36% of the bond money is devoted to the construction of dams and pipelines that will send Sacramento River water to big agricultural companies in the Central Valley. Only 6.9% is earmarked for safe and clean drinking water, some of which will benefit low-income communities. There is no guaranteed funding for much needed projects to replace crumbling infrastructure (like sewer systems) in urban areas. Proposition 1 will not make rain fall from the sky. But it will take our money and use it for the benefit of big agricultural corporations, while building dams will impact the few natural resources we have left.

Hoopa Valley Tribe Opposes Proposition 1 by Dan Bacher

The Hoopa Tribal Council agreed across the table to oppose California’s ballot measure Prop. 1, Governor Jerry Brown’s $7.5 billion water bond.

Danielle Vigil-Masten, Chairwoman of the Hoopa Valley Tribe on the Trinity River, urges people to get out and Vote NO on Prop. 1.

“California – vote NO on California Prop. 1,” Vigil-Masten wrote on Facebook. “This bill will kill the natural ecosystem and rivers and tributaries on the North Coast. This is for money to construct a dam in Maxwell or in that area.”

toxic algae

“There has been no information provided about the damage this can cause to environment as well as to who will receive the benefit. It will also flood SACRED SITES of tribes,” she noted.

“Northern California does not have enough water to supply the State of California – it’s time for people to CONSERVE and use common sense to not build or grow farms where there is NO Water! Vote NO, and Stop this MADNESS! Please share this with everyone you know in the State of California! Water Warriors…..stand up now!” she emphasized.

The Hoopa Valley Tribe joins the Winnemem Wintu Tribe, Pulga Rancheria Concow Maidu Indians and a broad coalition of fishing groups, grassroots environmental organizations, family farmers, consumer organizations and one union in opposition to Prop. 1.

Save water, save money – vote NO on Proposition 1!

The Case Against Prop 1 And A True Water Solution — NO on Prop 1!

  1. The Case Against Proposition 1 – State Water Bond – A Bad Investment

Proposition 1 (the state Water Bond) is a bad investment for California and a burden to taxpayers. It does not mitigate the effects of drought, and it does nothing to establish long-term water self-sufficiency. Vote NO on Proposition 1.

Proposition 1 is expensive. Prop. 1 puts California deeper and deeper into debt. California taxpayers will need to pay $15 billion for these changes. California is already a staggering $770 billion in debt. Prop. 1 will cost $360 million a year for the next 40 years.

Prop. 1 is a taxpayer giveaway. It will expand our debt and takes needed funds away from education and our schools, health care, and other priorities.

Prop. 1 will not solve our water problems. It will divert more water from our rivers and streams, make our environment less stable and expose us to new problems.

Prop. 1’s expense will go to build projects that will NOT solve our water problem, but will benefit wealthy agriculture corporations who want more access to California’s water.

We should not go into debt to build projects for billion-dollar farming conglomerates.

Continue: Read the Case Against Prop 1.

  1. A True Water Solution

Prop 1 is a corporate water grab for special interests. Californians deserve sustainable water solutions. If Prop 1’s authors wanted to help Californians, the water bond would:

Fund the Development of a Real Water Budget

Calfiornia’s water supply is currently over-committed by more than 5 times in a normal year. Any real water solution must start with a true accounting of our water supply, who controls it, and how that water is used. Only with a deep understanding of our water supply can we plan for fair and reliable access to water for all Californians. Prop 1 offers only minimal funding for this solution.

Improve Infrastructure to Stop Water Loss

A real water solution involves smart steps to avoid water waste. The water bond should help pay to remove old plumbing and replace it with low-flow options and new devices that tell users how much water they’re using. In addition, 10-20% of municipal water supplies are lost through water main breaks; Prop 1 should fund the installation of wireless underground systems that track these breaks for fast repair. Most importantly, the bond should prioritize funds to repair and upgrade aging underground water delivery systems, which would regain over 500,000 acre feet of water annually. Prop 1 offers only minimal funding for this solution.

Provide for Local Water Capture and Storage

A real water solution would pay to install new infrastructure like cisterns to capture and store sudden or intense rains on public, business and residential properties across our communities. Prop 1 offers only minimal funding for this solution.

Fund Incentives to Conserve

50% of water in urban areas is used for landscaping. A real water solution should provide incentives to homeowners to switch to drought-resistant landscaping. In addition, agriculture uses 80% of water in California. The water bond should help farmers save water by installing drip irrigation everywhere possible, reducing agricultural use to sixty percent. Prop 1 does not offer this solution.

Repurpose Toxic, Inappropriate Farmland

Much California agriculture takes place on dry, polluted land that drains into rivers. A real water solution would save hundreds of thousands of acre-feet per year by buying out these farms and helping their owners convert the land to profitable solar or wind energy production. Prop 1 offers only minimal funding for this solution.

Mitigate Predicted Reduced Water Supply

Sierra watersheds are expected to see a 21% reduction in flow over the next 70 years due to climate change. A real water solution funds watershed restoration at headwater sites to help increase water production. Prop 1 offers only minimal funding for this solution.

no on prop 1

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “On the fence on Proposition One? Let us push you off!

  1. This is to support and subsidize, at tax payer’s expense, central valley corporate agriculture that itself is doing nothing much to reduce water use.

    Where are the anti tax crusaders usually heard from on this issue?…silent, and paid off I’d bet.

    Sure, the Corp’s Prop 1 advocates have well choreographed events such as the NPR segment where they interview some scientist researching dry farming, and feature (let’s call them hippies, since they do when the cameras are turned off) some farmer’s marketeers selling dry farmed produce. So, hippe growers and scientists are working on dry farming..oh, right , they also featured a corporate ag supervisor who mansplained all his meters and charts and said it wasn’t working, they needed water for more profit…that kind of ‘working’.
    The hippie farmers and scientists showed dry farming positive results and promise.

    But the reality is such as the Resnicks who have planted and continue to plant nut crops that are very thirsty, all over the central valley. You hear about dry farmed grapes, but the Resnicks are attacking the delicate Paso Robles area water supply with new vineyards there as well…

    The reality is that there are widely planted crops subsidized by taxpayers such as cotton and rice that are also not really very suited to dry farming yet persist there with long time huge government subsidies.. And NOW we are expected to pay the costs of these ‘improvements’ that benefit only the profiteering of these giant agriculture enterprises.

    This a classic example of corporate welfare: the privatization of profits and the public subsidizing the costs.

    75% of cal’s water goes to agriculture, 25% to residential, including pools and golf courses. so any whining about residential/personal water habits or jabber about Oprah’s/celebrity giant lawns is the sign of a ag water troll, probably paid altho they sadly have many volunteers.

    This is NOT about residential water or residential water habits.

    The northern california tribes’s efforts on this issue have been excellent.

    No on Prop 1.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. When Prop. 1 passes the dams and diversions can and should be protested. (There’s also $$ available for new nuke plants but they are not getting built). Promising aspects of Prop. 1 are the local boards it funds charged with managing local water supplies to do all the great things pointed out in the list above…except…our local board will be appointed with the same caliber moron like all the rest in making sure public money is funneled to the rich and innovation is undermined.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Talk about lack of strategy, mainstream progressives are really not effective at protecting our future. It is astounding that the Cali Dems and Big Green were willing to roll over for Big Ag and Big Oil with the CA Water Bond Prop 1 right as the US Senate/Congress goes Republican. Like Obama would stand up to archaic water infrastructure with a veto even if the science says it is destructive. Get ready for an outright assault on the few remaining federal legal protections for our rivers. The ESA and Wild and Scenic Rivers be DAMMED, Nor Cal water is now for the taking. Hope all those folks who talked about how the dams “can and should be protested” are the ones on the front lines….at least Chesbro had the smarts to know how to define his legacy by opposing this water theft water bond.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s