Is the US falling right into Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s trap?

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

As the war drums keep beating, the US is now involving itself more in the regional Middle East conflict involving ISIL/ISIS/IS. As many readers have seen in the media, America now seems to be ready to bomb ISIS inside of Syria. “The enemy of our enemy is our friend” doesn’t seem to hold true in this case. In fact, what is the strategy here? Has Congress declared war on Syria or ISIS? Not that we’ve seen.

All sides in the Syrian civil war have committed atrocities and war crimes, according to the United Nations:

What is it that the US gains by involving ourselves in this conflict? The answer is simple…the loss of American lives and money. Our involvement with the Middle East is only “strategic” as long as we are dependent on protecting our imports of oil. Is there a solution to constantly making the wrong decisions in our management of the Middle East? Yes.

In the Examiner’s opinion, there is a small measure of truth that comes from the very far right. Namely, Ron Paul. Although we disagree with his positions in so many areas, he has been very clear in his opposition to Ron Paul warour interventionist policies overseas. Using American tax dollars and military force, to enable oil companies to ship oil to the US without providing their own security is not only causing our continued intervention in the Middle East, it’s also subsidizing cheap gas which will inevitably destroy the very environment we live in. The libertarian mantra of less foreign intervention and smaller government is completely correct in this area. There is no reason to continue funding our military for the “defense” or our country, when our only “defensive” actions seem to be bombing and attacking third world nations and groups that have no real military to speak of.

The other area that we could work on is in focusing on our own place in the world. We need to use less energy, or use energy smartly. It’s that simple. If the US stopped subsidizing oil shipments by providing military protection then oil companies would have to provide their own protection. That would mean oil prices would go up. Hard on the pocket, but necessary in order to kick the oil habit. Surely our oil profiteers would have an incentive to keep up mobile and using energy. So higher prices wouldn’t lead to catastrophe, just what’s known as a “market correction” in our current methods of using energy.

As far as the war we’re engaging with ISIL/ISIS/IS….Dr. Paul lays it out pretty well:

“Early this year, a radical Islamist group, ISIS, began taking over territory in Iraq, starting with Fallujah. The organization had been operating in Syria, strengthened by US support for the overthrow of the Syrian government. ISIS obtained a broad array of sophisticated US weapons in Syria, very often capturing them from other US-approved opposition groups. Some claim that lax screening criteria allowed some ISIS fighters to even participate in secret CIA training camps in Jordan and Turkey.isis on parade

This month, ISIS became the target of a new US bombing campaign in Iraq. The pretext for the latest US attack was the plight of a religious minority in the Kurdish region currently under ISIS attack. The US government and media warned that up to 100,000 from this group, including some 40,000 stranded on a mountain, could be slaughtered if the US did not intervene at once. Americans unfortunately once again fell for this propaganda and US bombs began to fall. Last week, however, it was determined that only about 2,000 were on the mountain and many of them had been living there for years! They didn’t want to be rescued!

This is not to say that the plight of many of these people is not tragic, but why is it that the US government did not say a word when three out of four Christians were forced out of Iraq during the ten year US occupation? Why has the US said nothing about the Christians slaughtered by its allies in Syria? What about all the Palestinians killed in Gaza or the ethnic Russians killed in east Ukraine?

The humanitarian situation was cynically manipulated by the Obama administrationpeople fleeing isis —  and echoed by the US media — to provide a reason for the president to attack Iraq again. This time it was about yet another regime change, breaking Kurdistan away from Iraq and protection of the rich oil reserves there, and acceptance of a new US military presence on the ground in the country.

President Obama has started another war in Iraq and Congress is completely silent. No declaration, no authorization, not even a debate. After 24 years we are back where we started. Isn’t it about time to re-think this failed interventionist policy? Isn’t it time to stop trusting the government and its war propaganda? Isn’t it time to leave Iraq alone?”



11 thoughts on “Is the US falling right into Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s trap?

  1. War pigs of every color rule the day while the ambitious look the other way. Ask your local Democrats why there is no substantial resistance to executive intervention and imperial war violence~


  2. The precipitating event that justified US airstrikes and special forces in Iraq was the report that Christians there were being harmed and displaced.

    After oil, Iranian defiance, and cold war II geopolitics are diminished as threats, our policy remains that in the Middle East our interests are to sensure that Christianity has an establishment there. When Bush declared a need for war on Iraq, he also called it a crusade. That label was sufficient justification for much popular support.


    • Yup. As the saying goes, “Onward, Christian Soldiers”. In the end, it’s all about protecting access to valuable resources (oil and gas). But that doesn’t hold the masses in place, so Christianity, terrorism, barbarity, or other such excuses need to be given so that our poor can go out and fight for the “interests” of the US. Pretty sad that the USA hasn’t learned all that much in the past 200+ years.


  3. That line of Toyota Trucks make me feel like I’m in SoHum.


  4. So, how else is religion going to stay in the news?


  5. Well, at least he’s got the Pirate Vote sewn up.

    “Arrrr… we be votin’ fer Chet ’cause he ain’t no land lubbin’ wimpy guy… Arrrr”

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I’m so cynical I see raised terror alerts as jingling keys. The threat in the UK just went up and made US news. What are they hoping we don’t notice?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. “Isn’t it time to leave Iraq alone?”

    No, sadly. We broke it, we bought it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s