Verizon brings US closer to an Oligarchy

monopolyVerizon struck a mortal blow against Net Neutrality by persuading a federal judge to throw out the Federal Communication Commission’s Open Internet Order.


Now FCC Chair Tom Wheeler faces a choice — he can stand up for Net Neutrality or help Verizon kill it for good. The fate of the open Internet rests on this choice.


Outrageously, Wheeler recently proposed a new set of rules that will put the final nail in the coffin for Net Neutrality. This is wrong. We only have until the May 15 FCC meeting to push back hard enough to get Wheeler to change course


Take action here:


verizon killedNet Neutrality is a principle that says that Internet users, not Internet service providers (ISPs), should be in control. It ensures that Internet service providers can’t speed up, slow down, or block web content based on its source, ownership, or destination.


Net Neutrality is dead for the time being — but the FCC could stand up to Verizon and AT&T and pass strong rules.


Instead, Wheeler’s proposed rules would divide the Internet into fast lanes for wealthy corporations and slow lanes for the rest of us. Internet service providers (ISPs) would be allowed to relegate content to the slow lane unless the content provider paid up.


That means that the speed you could stream a video, for example, would not just depend on the kind of Internet plan you purchase from your ISP. It would also heavily depend upon whether the entity hosting the video paid for the express lane so that it didn’t take forever to download. Not only is this anti-consumer, allowing corporations to decide what kind of content you can access on the Internet is fundamentally anti-democratic.

Back in 2010, this latest court decision was utterly predictable. A federal court had already ruled that unless the FCC reversed the Bush-era decision to deregulate broadband, the FCC couldn’t enforce Net Neutrality rules. Then FCC Chair Genachowski tested the waters with a proposal to re-regulate (or in the jargon of the FCC “reclassify”) broadband. Genachowski himself said that, according to the FCC General Counsel, pushing ahead with policies without reregulating broadband would be unwise given the tenuous legal footing the FCC would find itself in.


But the Obama administration’s support for Net Neutrality was so weak that his FCC declined to reclassify broadband as a prerequisite to passing Net Neutrality rules. Without providing this legal framework, the Open Internet Order was never anything more than a cynical ploy by Democrats to claim a victory on Net Neutrality while actually caving on real protections for consumers.


New FCC Chair Tom Wheeler has a chance to change this. He recently made a strong statement in support of Net Neutrality and the necessary legal framework to defend it, saying that “it is essential that the FCC continue to maintain an open Internet and maintain the legal ability to intervene promptly and effectively in the event of aggravated circumstances.”


Now we need to hold him to it. If he wants to ensure the FCC maintains an open Internet, he needs to do far better than proposals that will allow for the corporate takeover of the Internet.


We need him to muster the political will to take action immediately and save Net Neutrality by reversing the deregulation of broadband and giving teeth to the FCC’s ability to enforce Net Neutrality rules and force Internet service providers to treat all traffic equally.

Again you can take action here:


3 thoughts on “Verizon brings US closer to an Oligarchy

  1. Internet users will be paying higher prices for subscriptions to companies which opt for the faster connection and more wasted time waiting for those which don’t. I have been noticing lately that even when I am very specific with my search phrase, the top offerings are often completely unrelated to what I requested, usually commercial sites completely irrelevant to my search.

    Unfortunately, the people with enough knowledge to serve on the FCC and other regulatory agencies are usually employed directly in or lobbyists for that industry. Some may be able to put aside their favoritism for the public good, but for most it is so ingrained that they are incapable of fairness and/or they are only interested in serving to advance the industry agenda.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. For more on this subject get Rebecca MacKinnon’s book “Consent of the Networked, The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom” published in 2012.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s